MEV Economics: Builders, Searchers, Validators
The full MEV value chain. Searchers, builders (Titan, BuilderNet, Quasar), MEV-Boost relays, validators, block construction economics, the "trust the relay" assumption versus optimistic relays and ePBS, fair sequencing services (Espresso, Astria), MEV redistribution (CowSwap MEV Blocker), Solana MEV economics (Jito $674M), and the "MEV is inevitable vs MEV is a bug" thesis.
17 min · expert · part of MEV & The Dark Forest
What you'll learn
- The Full Value Chain
- Searchers and Builders
- Relays and Validators
- Block Construction Economics and the Trust Problem
- MEV Redistribution and Solana MEV Economics
- The "MEV Is Inevitable" vs "MEV Is a Bug" Debate
- For Deeper Reading
Key terms
- Searcher
- Actor (typically an individual or small team) running automated bots that identify MEV opportunities (arbitrage, liquidations, sandwiches, etc.) and submit bundles to builders. Typically earn ~30% of gross MEV. Hundreds of independent searchers in the ecosystem.
- Builder
- Specialized firm that combines searcher bundles into profitable blocks and bids them to validators. Highly consolidated market: Titan Builder ~52%, BuilderNet ~25%, Quasar ~15% as of April 2026.
- Relay (MEV-Boost)
- Trusted intermediary between builders and validators. Receives sealed blocks from builders, shows headers to validators, enforces commit-before-reveal pattern. Major relays: Flashbots, BuilderNet, Ultrasound, Eden, Manifold.
- Trust the Relay Assumption
- Architectural weakness of MEV-Boost: validators must trust relays not to leak block contents, front-run commitments, or collude with builders. Mitigated by validators connecting to multiple relays.
- Optimistic Relays
- Reform to MEV-Boost where the relay commits to validator that block is valid; if wrong, relay is slashed. Reduces but does not eliminate trust requirement.
- ePBS (Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation)
- Protocol-level reform to bring MEV-Boost-like functionality into Ethereum consensus directly, eliminating the need for trusted relays. On Ethereum roadmap; in research as of 2026.
- Inclusion Lists
- Proposed mechanism allowing validators to specify transactions that builders must include in any block. Reduces builder censorship discretion.
- Fair Sequencing Services (FSS)
- Cryptographic protocols that enforce fair transaction ordering, eliminating MEV at the protocol level. Examples: Espresso Sequencer (used by several L2s), Astria (similar shared sequencer).
- CowSwap MEV Blocker (Redistribution)
- CoW DAO's public RPC service that routes through builders with anti-sandwich and revenue-sharing agreements. Shares 90% of winning searcher's bid back to the user. Most user-favorable MEV-redistribution model in production.
- Validator MEV Income
- Additional income validators earn via MEV-Boost on top of standard staking rewards. Typical 0.04-0.10 ETH per proposed block from MEV; aggregate annual uplift of 20-40% on top of base staking returns.
- Jito (Solana)
- Dominant Solana MEV infrastructure used by ~93% of Solana validators. Jito-Solana validator client routes bundles through tip-based auctions. Cumulative tips paid to validators/stakers: ~$674M through end-2024.
- MEV Inevitability vs Bug Thesis
- Two opposing views of MEV. Inevitability: MEV is structural to any permissionless market with ordering; the goal is transparency and redistribution. Bug: MEV is a fixable artifact of immature protocol design; cryptographic sequencing and batch auctions can eliminate it.
Read the full lesson in the CryptoBipto app.
Open lessonEducational only — not financial advice.
