Bitcoin's 'Anti-Spam' Fork Dies After Just Two Blocks — Here's What Actually Happened
6h ago · 1 source
A controversial Bitcoin fork designed to filter out so-called 'spam' transactions — likely targeting Ordinals, inscriptions, or similar data-heavy uses — failed almost immediately after launch, managing to mine only two blocks before grinding to a halt. The fork appears to have attracted virtually no miner support, underscoring the difficulty of splitting off from Bitcoin's main chain without significant community consensus.
WHY IT MATTERS
Think of a Bitcoin fork like a group of people deciding to leave a city and start their own town with different rules. In this case, some Bitcoin users didn't like certain types of transactions (think of them as digital collectibles and tokens being stored on Bitcoin), calling them 'spam.' So they tried to create a new version of Bitcoin that would block those transactions. But here's the problem: a Bitcoin-like network needs miners — the computers that process transactions and keep the network secure — and almost no miners showed up to support this new town. After processing just two batches of transactions (called 'blocks'), the whole thing stopped working. It's a reminder that in crypto, you can disagree with how a network is being used, but actually splitting off and creating a viable alternative requires massive support — and that's incredibly hard to get.
Read the full analysis with a CryptoBipto membership
Create a free account and subscribe to unlock deep-dive analysis on every story.
Get startedSOURCES
RELATED
Educational only — not financial advice.