Skip to main content
Back to news
RegulationMajor story — Significance is rated automatically and is not a price signal.

Circle and Tether Both Oppose MiCA Stablecoin Bank Reserve Requirements

(4 hours ago) · 1 source · Summarized by CryptoBipto

Circle and Tether, typically competitors in the stablecoin market, have both expressed opposition to the European Union's MiCA regulation requiring stablecoin issuers to hold a significant portion of reserves in European bank accounts. The two companies argue that the bank deposit requirements introduce unnecessary risk and may undermine the stability of stablecoins rather than protect it.

WHY IT MATTERS

Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies designed to maintain a steady value, usually pegged to a currency like the US dollar or euro. To keep that peg, issuers hold reserves — assets that back each token. Think of it like a coat check: for every coat (stablecoin) you hand out, you need to have a real coat (reserve asset) stored safely so people can reclaim it. The EU's MiCA law requires stablecoin issuers to keep a chunk of those reserves in European bank accounts. Circle and Tether both argue this is risky because if that bank fails, the reserves could be lost — similar to how putting all your valuables in one storage locker is riskier than spreading them across several secure locations. This debate matters because stablecoins are widely used in crypto trading and payments, and the rules governing their reserves affect how safe they are for everyday users.

The EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, which has been rolling out in phases, includes provisions that require stablecoin issuers operating in Europe to keep a meaningful share of their reserves in bank deposits at EU-based financial institutions.

Read the full analysis with a CryptoBipto membership

Members can read the full analysis of every story, not just the headline.

Get started

SOURCES

  • cryptoslate.com

RELATED

USDCUSDTStablecoinsMiCAEU RegulationReserve RequirementsBanking Risk